• How To
    • Win Your DFS League
    • Win Your Auction Draft
    • Win Your Snake Draft
    • Download Projections
    • Scrape Projections
    • Calculate Projections for Your League
    • Examine Accuracy of Projections
    • Identify Sleepers
    • Save Custom Settings
    • Use the API
  • Strategy
    • Fantasy Football is Like Stock Picking
    • Use Projections, Not Rankings
  • Projections
    • Our Projections
    • Who has the Best Projections?
    • Draft the Best Starting Lineup
    • Projections are More Accurate than Rankings
    • Points by Position Rank
    • Players’ Risk Levels
    • Value Over Replacement
    • Bid-Up-To Value
    • Player Value Gap
    • Gold Mining
    • Weekly Variability
    • Are Subscription Sources More Accurate?
  • Statistics
    • How To Learn R
    • R is Better than Excel
    • Do Stats Help in Fantasy Football?
    • Download/Run Our Scripts
    • ffanalytics R Package
  • Apps
    • Auction Draft Optimizer
    • Snake Draft Optimizer
    • Weekly Lineup Optimizer
    • Rankings/Projections for Your League
    • API
    • Other Tools
      • Stock Analysis
    • Error Logging
  • Testimonials
  • About the Site
    • About
    • Authors
      • Isaac Petersen
    • FAQ
    • FFA Insider
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Service
  • Donate

Fantasy Football Analytics

Fantasy Football Analytics Interview with Rotoviz

27
  • by Isaac Petersen
  • in In the Media · Projections
  • — 5 Jul, 2016

The creator of Fantasy Football Analytics discussed the website in a recent interview with Rotoviz on the Numbers Game Podcast.  We discussed the “wisdom of the crowd”, subscription vs. free projections, reasons to use R over Excel, lessons learned from previous first round fantasy picks, and more.

Fast forward to 25 minutes of the audio to hear the interview:

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Share

— Isaac Petersen

My name is Isaac and I'm an assistant professor with a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology. Why am I writing about fantasy football and data analysis? Because fantasy football involves the intersection of two things I love: sports and statistics. With this site, I hope to demonstrate the relevance of statistics for choosing the best team in fantasy football.

27 Comments

  1. Westbrook says:
    July 5, 2016 at 9:14 am

    Thank you.
    But I didnt understand how you can figure out which players to avoid, for example last year CJ Anderson had a high risk, number wise. He had a low risk number with 3.34, this year David Johnson pretty low 3.55. But in the interview you said they are riskier because of very little games played, but it doesnt show up in the risk number.

    Thats the part I couldnt understand in the interview.

    Reply
    • Isaac Petersen says:
      July 5, 2016 at 4:28 pm

      See my response to Kenneth below for a description of how we calculate risk. Our calculation does not take into account sample size (how many games played i.e., the number of games from which the projections are estimated), so that is an additional factor that is important to consider.

      Hope that helps!

      Reply
      • Matt says:
        July 14, 2016 at 2:01 pm

        Have you considered adding age and lack of data (rookies and sophomores) as additional factors in the risk score? Or at least using lack of data as a factor and adding age as an additional column (Age could supposedly be factored into the projections, but I think many older players are still overvalued)?

        Reply
        • Isaac Petersen says:
          July 14, 2016 at 9:41 pm

          Hi Matt,

          We do plan to add columns for age, experience, etc. Probably wouldn’t add them into the risk index because they have non-linear effects (i.e., both young and old players have high risk). Adding them as columns would provide users more info to use in their decision making.

          Thanks,
          Isaac

          Reply
      • Chris says:
        August 15, 2016 at 3:03 pm

        Error
        An unexpected error has occurred. Please contact the system administrator.

        – Current problem with the projections app

        Reply
        • Isaac Petersen says:
          August 15, 2016 at 9:07 pm

          Apps should be up now!

          Reply
    • Duane Tomka says:
      August 4, 2016 at 8:00 am

      Great web site and I plan on using this in my upcoming draft but the more I think about the snake draft tool…I am in a league where my roster has 3 flex spots (QB-RB-WR-TE-WR/RB-WR/RB/TE-WR/TE).

      Should there be some input for my roster since VOR will depend on how I decide to fiil out my roster? Maybe this input is not needed…help, a little confused with draft on Sat.
      Thanks!
      Duane

      Reply
      • Isaac Petersen says:
        August 4, 2016 at 2:55 pm

        https://fantasyfootballanalytics.net/about-the-site/faq#2qb-flex

        Hope that helps!
        -Isaac

        Reply
  2. Kenneth S Hamilton says:
    July 5, 2016 at 2:38 pm

    I think risk is based on the range of projections. So if everyone has the same player with the same stats he has a low risk. If there is a big difference in the high/low projections then high risk. I could be wrong….

    Reply
    • Isaac Petersen says:
      July 5, 2016 at 4:26 pm

      Yes, risk is based on the variability of projections and rankings across sources, along with their injury risk. For more info, see here:
      https://fantasyfootballanalytics.net/2014/06/custom-rankings-and-projections-for-your-league.html

      Reply
  3. Ben Buchanan says:
    August 9, 2016 at 6:52 pm

    I have been looking at trying to sort out consistent players versus boom/bust players. Is coefficient of variation the best way to look at that? Is that something you report that I have missed. This is an awesome website. Thank you

    Reply
    • Isaac Petersen says:
      August 10, 2016 at 6:52 am

      Hi Ben,

      Yes the CV would tell you players’ game-to-game consistency or inconsistency. Players with a lower CV are more consistent. Players with a higher CV are more inconsistent (boom/bust as you say).

      Hope that helps,
      Isaac

      Reply
      • Ben Buchanan says:
        August 10, 2016 at 3:33 pm

        Do you have that information recorded? Is it possible to scrape that from any of the sites? The R program is very new to me, but is very useful.

        Reply
        • Isaac Petersen says:
          August 10, 2016 at 5:49 pm

          You can download historical weekly performance from our Projections tool or from ProFootballReference. You can then calculate game-to-game CV from that.

          Reply
  4. Jones says:
    August 13, 2016 at 12:53 am

    Hi Isaac,

    I am trying to come up with a little more rigor for drafting, particularly with VOR as well as dropoff. Any ideas how to come up with a rule? Or is this where we have to shift more into drafting as an art than a science?

    Best,
    Jones

    Reply
    • Jones says:
      August 13, 2016 at 2:36 am

      Oh, and I already have a rule for risk-adjusted VOR, so that’s incorporated, although it could be better. I am just subtracting the risk value less five, and then I am subtracting additional amounts for players that have very low experience or are nearing the dropoff ages (e.g., AP, Forte). Could be better I’m sure, but at least it is something.

      I also have a rule to adjust VOR for starters to weight their floor higher, and to weight ceiling higher for bench players.

      Reply
    • Isaac Petersen says:
      August 14, 2016 at 8:59 am

      If you were to build an algorithm/rule, it would probably take into account other factors, as well (e.g., risk, positions you need, positions your opponents need, etc.). If you just want to focus on VOR and dropoff, I’d suggest focusing first on VOR and use dropoff to distinguish between players who have similar VORs.

      Reply
  5. Chris says:
    August 22, 2016 at 9:42 pm

    Just wondering why seattle and carolina defenses are ranked so low in projections…i mean if vikings out perform the two previous as u have forecasted..then u guys have truly mastered the art…but not a single other site has taken such a bold prediction.

    Reply
    • Isaac Petersen says:
      August 22, 2016 at 11:10 pm

      We aggregate multiple sources of projections using an average. The reason for the lower projections is that FantasySharks have projected the Seahawks DST at 0 safeties and 0 TDs.

      Reply
  6. Jeremy says:
    August 24, 2016 at 1:21 am

    Isaac, apologies if you have a post elsewhere on the site about this topic, but have you ever looked at (and is there enough data to reliably evaluate) position-level projection quality? For example, maybe CBS is great at projecting receptions and FFToday is consistently the best at XP? Possibly making the case that each position should be weighted separately?

    Reply
    • Isaac Petersen says:
      August 24, 2016 at 6:33 am

      You can examine the accuracy of projections by position in our tools. For more info, see here:
      https://fantasyfootballanalytics.net/2015/07/accuracy-of-fantasy-football-projections-interactive-scatterplot-in-r.html

      Reply
  7. Nick says:
    August 25, 2016 at 8:05 pm

    Will the weekly lineup optimizer be available for weekly use with 2016 projections? So far I’ve only been able to run the optimizer for the full 2016 season. Will the week 1 optimizer come out when the major websites put out their weekly projections?

    Reply
    • Isaac Petersen says:
      August 25, 2016 at 9:13 pm

      https://fantasyfootballanalytics.net/about-the-site/faq#weeklyWhen

      Reply
  8. Will says:
    August 27, 2016 at 12:46 am

    I have seemed to have found a problem with QB/RB/WR/TE flex set to 1, AAV set to ESPN and PPR scoring for the Auction Projections. It sets all the auction values very low like to $1.

    Also, is there any way to download the auction projections?

    Reply
    • Isaac Petersen says:
      August 27, 2016 at 8:00 am

      https://fantasyfootballanalytics.net/2013/06/win-your-fantasy-football-auction-draft.html#comment-18246

      You can download from the Projections tool, not currently from the Lineup Optimizer (but it’s on our to-do list).

      Reply
  9. Doug says:
    August 31, 2016 at 12:35 am

    Hi Isaac,

    Should the dropoff value column in the snake draft optimizer be dynamic as players come off the board (or if they begin the draft off the board in the case of keeper leagues)?

    Thanks

    Reply
    • Isaac Petersen says:
      August 31, 2016 at 9:15 pm

      Yes, that’s on our to-do list, thanks!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Previous story The ffanalytics R Package for Fantasy Football Data Analysis
  • Next story Introducing FFA Insider
  • Tabs

    • Most Popular
    • Recent Posts
    • The ffanalytics R Package for Fantasy Football Data AnalysisJune 18, 2016
    • 2015 Fantasy Football Projections using OpenCPUMay 28, 2015
    • Win Your Fantasy Football Auction Draft: Determine the Optimal Players to Draft with this AppJune 14, 2013
    • Win Your Fantasy Football Snake Draft with this AppSeptember 1, 2013
    • Post-Combine Mock: Team Needs and TargetsMarch 10, 2025
    • Fantasy Football Weekly Cheat Sheet: Week 18 (2024)January 3, 2025
    • Fantasy Football Weekly Cheat Sheet: Week 17 (2024)December 26, 2024
    • Fantasy Football Weekly Cheat Sheet: Week 16 (2024)December 18, 2024
  • FFA Insider

    Logo
  • Categories

    • About the Authors
    • Articles
    • Auction Drafts
    • Draft Optimizer
    • FFA Insider
    • Gold Mining
    • How To
    • In the Media
    • Luck
    • Package
    • Projections
    • R
    • Risk
    • Theory
    • Tools
    • Trade Strategy
    • Uncategorized
    • Weekly
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Our Partners

    R-bloggers

  • Support us building things... Even a cup of coffee ($1.99) helps us stay awake!

  • Subscribe to the Fantasy Football Analytics mailing list (no spam).
    Loading

        © Fantasy Football Analytics

        %d